« Go Kiwis | Main | Microslosh Strikes Again »

February 19, 2003

Britain Too Dangerous?

An item in the SMH today states that Bush has decided that Britain is too dangerous for his neice to visit. I wonder if that is because of possible Iraqi (Eyerackee) retaliation or because of public opinion being against political will. I mean, after all, Bush is not exactly popular in Europe at the moment.

Of course the article could be a load of old cobblers because it mentions a younger brother of the president named Neil. Really? The only dynastic mentions in the past have been about a brother named Jeb (renamed Jed in a previous entry to invoke memories of the Beverly Hillbillies). Are there yet more Bush offspring who will become presidents (ala the Kennedy family) or was it a typo, a stuffup or someone who didn't check carefully. Actually I don't care enough about the issue to investigate it any further......

The big issue is going to be WWDC in May. How can I convince my wife that it will be safe for me to travel to the US when they don't think it safe to travel OS?

Posted by Ozguru at February 19, 2003 12:00 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mu.nu/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1642

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Britain Too Dangerous?:

» Retrospective - 2003/02 from G'day Mate (Mk III)
I have often wandered through the archives of a blog somewhere by clicking on next/prev post but it has often been a frustrating experience because there is usually little in the way of a map to guide the unfortunate traveller. For that... [Read More]

Tracked on April 4, 2005 01:36 AM

» Retrospective - 2003/02 from G'Day Mate MkII
I have often wandered through the archives of a blog somewhere by clicking on next/prev post but it has often been a frustrating experience because there is usually little in the way of a map to guide the unfortunate traveller. For that... [Read More]

Tracked on June 8, 2005 12:05 AM

Comments