« February 2003 | Main | April 2003 »

March 31, 2003

Tale of Three Cards

These are all true stories that have occurred in the last couple of months. Guess which institution you should be dealing with?

Alfred (not his real name) had a credit card with a big bank (which bank?). He noticed some strange transactions on his bill so he gives the bank a call. They advise him that he is unidentifiable and so he trots into a local branch the next day at the start of his lunch break. He is still there at the end of his lunch break and most of his afternoon tea (1 hour, 15 minutes). He gets to make a "stat dec" and is then sent home with the assurance that the bank will contact him about the matter and he should pay the several thousand dollars anyway pending a better solution. Three weeks later and nothing has happened but he is dreading the next bill.

Belinda (not her real name) has a credit card with a big shopping chain (which may be affiliated with the bank above). Belinda decides to give her hubby a subsidiary card and gets the paperwork. When she starts to fill in the bit about her card number she realizes that she can't find the card. After a full scale search involving at least a platoon of willing assistants, she calls the emergency number of the credit card people. After a bit of discussion they admit that in fact her card was suspended about three weeks ago because someone (a retailer where she had used the card) found it and sent it in. To organize another card, she would have to call again during business hours. Belinda's number one question was "When were you going to tell me about this?" and the response was "If you needed the card, you would have got in touch with us".

Charlie (not his or her real name) has a credit card with a credit union. They noticed some suspicious character was generating sequences of bogus credit card numbers and realized that the sequence would run into Charlie's number in the near future. Charlie being OS (Overseas) they got in touch with the local contact provided by Charlie, passed on the news and provided a method for Charlie to have the card cancelled (and a new one issued) before there was any problem. For such superb service they can obviously be named as the NSW Teachers Credit Union. I reckon they deserve the equivalent of an Oscar for customer service.

Posted by Ozguru at 07:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 29, 2003

You look familiar...

Tonight's story was overhead in a restaurant in Coogee. At the next table were a couple of sportsmen - one an Aussie, one a Kiwi swapping stories about overseas trips representing their respective countries. The Aussie told a story about a swanky restaurant in the USA where the tables were arranged in rows and filled from one side of the room to the other (I remember something similar in Germany/Austria). The entire Aussie team were seated along one side of the table with a couple of Kiwi mates at the end furthest from the door. They were all indulging in a bit of the amber nectar when a well built (chubby) fellow slipped in opposite them and started sliding along the bench to the end.

As he sat down the first Aussie said: "Gday mate, you look at bit familiar". As he slid along the next one said "Oweryagoin Oright? I seen you before somewhere". And so it continued with each Aussie professing some faint glimer of recognition but not particularly concerned with identification until the stranger drew level with the first Kiwi who said: "Hang on, I reckon you're on the television". The second Kiwi agreed: "Ain't you that Drew Carey bloke?"

Says something about the Australian sportsman. A mere tv celebrity and comic is nothing to get excited about. Not like say scoring a goal (= touchdown for Americans? or is that a putdown?).

Of course I know a Kiwi who will also point out the relative intelligence of the Kiwi who at least knew who the stranger was but I also didn't mention that the dinner was to celebrate beating the Kiwis in an exhibition match :rofl

Posted by Ozguru at 08:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Protesters

It can be hard being a teacher. I think one of the features of being a teacher is having certain assurance of your own weaknesses. As a part time teacher I am always horribly aware of my own inability to spell. I am terrified that I will write something wrong on the board or misspell something in an exam (or sometimes that I will leave a out). As a side effect, I have this desire to correct other people's spelling (and grammar) sometimes.

Take this protester (source - email from friend - if this is your image, I am happy to acknowledge it...):

2003-04-29--Pro_War_America_2.png

Doesn't it look a bit better corrected:

2003-04-29--Pro_War_America_2.png

Of course, "Me a Moron" should be "I am a moron" but the assumption here is that this gentleman's grammar will be equivalent to his spelling.

It would be worse if it turns out that he is a teacher :grin

Posted by Ozguru at 06:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

March 27, 2003

Scott McNealy

On Tuesday I had the pleasure of attending a brunch, hosted by the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce, as a guest of Sun Microsystems Australia. The guest speaker was Scott McNealy, Chairman and CEO of Sun Microsystems Inc.

The topic was about the future of the IT industry which at times was compared to both the phone industry and building your own airplane. Scott was pushing the point that the IT industry has "got it all wrong". The customer is not interested in the parts, they want a solution where the parts are hidden beneath a "blanket". The idea is to outline the solution and assume that the blanket can handle the implementation. Certainly this may be the future but there are a lot of assumptions about both how and when such a vision can occur.

The airplane idea was tied to the development of a systems project where the "owner" buys parts from many suppliers, a wheel here, a seat there, a bit of a wing somewhere else. They then set up their own hanger near a runway and commence assembling this plane. When it all gets too hard, they call in IBM GSA (actually named in the speech) to use some duct tape and string to tie it all together with lots of care but no responsibility. When they finish, the plane is handed over and the owner tries to take off for New Zealand. When it crashes (before takeoff) the system integrator is there with fire-extinguishers, best practice guidelines and a proposal for extending the contract.

Scott also waxed lyrical about the uses of IT when it become ubiquitous and therefore invisible. He mentioned the story about a car negotiating with nearby gas (petrol) stations to get the best price (modulated with the ability to supply milk because the refrigerator reports that it has none) for a given quantity of fuel with no driver intervention until the service station is selected and driving instructions are provided. This segued into a more practical outline of US-wide roaming between Sun offices, the multi-use of office space by having common terminals and smart cards, the extension of roaming to the home and later international spaces.

Personally I liked the independent desktop solution where activating the "dumb terminal" (actually a Java Station in this case - but any thing client host would work) downloads my personal environment. That environment could be Winblows or Linux or whatever because there is a level of independence between the display device and the provision of the environment. We are already doing some of this via Citrix which supplies the "client" side for multiple desktop machines. Scott merely extended this model by making the desktop system no more than a host for the thin client software.

Strangely, given the hosts, there was also some discussion of tagging individuals with unique identifiers. As Scott pointed out, in the US it is normal to use an ID tag on a cat or dog because they are valuable property - surely your kids are even more valuable. There was also a neat example of technology and the car where it reports to "dad" (not "big brother") that the kids are driving too fast and not in the direction of school so that "dad" can talk to the kids and suggest they "slow down and turn right".

The talk hit the right balance of generalism without becoming a hard sell for Sun products. A few times, Scott pointed out that he was pushing standards that were good for the industry even where Sun could not benefit personally from the standard. This came up a number of times in the comparison of .NOT and Java/XML as competing standards. Scott was almost apologetic about the inability of Java/XML to match Microsloth in hosting and supporting viruses.

One of the questions at the end related to the impact of this vision on the industry as a whole. The most obvious impact was on the role of system integrator (no longer required because the stuff integrates itself) which was clearly noted by the speaker who thanked Scott and came from a SI player. Scott also suggested that investing in office space was a bad idea given the more immediate impact of more effective use of existing space and the distribution of the work force - global roaming, he suggested, will completely change the concept of a workplace and for that matter the idea of a CBD. The third impact would be on the component players who could not stretch themselves into solution providers (e.g. Microsloth being "software only").

Overall, the talk was fascinating. In many ways it was a great pity that more of the managerial staff and systems architects were not able to hear Scott expound his personal vision of the future.

Posted by Ozguru at 07:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 26, 2003

Hackers vs Microsloth

The Register has some more information about the Microsoft vs Hackers advert that was withdrawn in South Africa (because it was misleading).

Here's a nickel....

Posted by Ozguru at 05:30 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Flame Wars...

On MacSlash there was an article about the fact that Adobe has decided to publish some PC vs Mac benchmarks to demonstrate that the PC is faster for some tasks that a Mac. The reason for interest in the claim is that it coincided with Adobe promoting the sale of DELL PCs. The suggestion was that perhaps the choice of what benchmarks to publish may have been influenced by commercial realities.

This rapidly degenerated into a flame war between PC and Mac bigots each trying to claim that either they had a "bigger one" or "wider one" or "faster one" or "more handsome one" or something.

An annonymous coward published the following perfect (unedited) comment:

OK, everybody, the reality check has bounced.

Now, simmer down and repeat after me:

IT'S JUST A FREAKIN' BOX OF ELECTRONIC PARTS THAT WAS OBSOLETE BEFORE IT SHIPPED TO ME. MY COMPUTER CHOICE IS INSIGNIFICANT IN THE LARGER SCHEME OF THE COSMOS. I WILL FIND SOMETHING MEANINGUL FOR MY LIFE OTHER THEN BITCHING AND MOANING ABOUT WHICH COMPUTER IS FASTER OR BETTER BECAUSE MY LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO SPEND IT FLAMING MESSAGE BOARDS WITH MY IGNORANT AND/OR INSIGNIFICANT EPHEMORAL OPINION.

Now, don't you feel better?

Posted by Ozguru at 08:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 25, 2003

Non-disclosure

Apple have apparently announced that there will be no more seed releases of Safari. This is because some of those who have signed NDA are making the seed releases available to the public. As a result, there will be no information about the newer developments, nor will there be a chance to test the new features.

I have not received copies from Apple but I have downloaded a copy from the internet. It does have the frequently requested tabs BUT it is not as stable as the official public beta. In fact it has a bad habit of consuming lots of memory and hanging. There are still some issues with the GUI, especially around the menu bar. It still doesn't appear to know how to tunnel https through a normal proxy server.

Oh well. Here's hoping there will be a more stable public beta at some point.

Last night, at the WWDC promo in Sydney, all the web pages in the demonstrations were shown in IE. I had almost forgotten how ugly that browser was after using Safari so much.....

Posted by Ozguru at 07:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 24, 2003

Is it a joke?

The election is over and the Labor government has been reinstated for another four years. More corruption, more incompetance, more dishonesty. Still there wasn't much in the way of decent competition, especially given the cash that Labor spent on advertising and promotion. I think the late arrival of the "back to school" funding (which arrived at the same time as the first lot of Labor propoganda) was probably deliberate - here's $50 bucks, vote for us so that we can destroy the schools, hospitals and police for anmother four years.

I also can't believe how many people voted for free drugs and bush fires. There were more who wanted to be high while being burnt to a crisp than there were Christians prepared to take a moral stand.

Well, I believe it was said that a people get the government they deserve - I just wonder what on earth we could have done so wrong to get this lot again.

Posted by Ozguru at 07:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 23, 2003

Talk about popular...

The Crazy Apple Rumors Site ran a fantastic spoof after Al Gore joined the board of Apple. The spoof claimed that George W Bush was challenging the vote (a la Florida). The article was picked up and run by a number of other sites (some of whom did not realise it was humour). It also featured in 'Apple Hot News' which is a fantastic achievement for a rumour/humour site.

As a result, the bandwidth to the site appears to have been overloaded and the most recent posting suggests that the authors are having a "spring break". On the other hand, maybe the spring break is due to the recent visit to the zoo and some excitement that may have occurred there ...

Posted by Ozguru at 09:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 22, 2003

Well I never...

After all that careful research, I got to the polling booth and found another candidate. You could have knocked me down with a feather. No mention in the papers, no junk in the mailbox, no doorknocking, no flyers on poles - absolutely no publicity for the UNITY candidate.

Well that reflects in the current vote count (as at 8pm, 16,500 votes counted) and the UNITY candidate is running at about one third of the Informal candidate who is running neck and neck with the independant and the democrat.

Posted by Ozguru at 08:30 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 21, 2003

Icons?

Ever wondered what some of those symbols mean? You know, the symbols that are used as "universal" pictograms that replace words. Everyone recognises the one that says put red electrical tape over and around anyone who smokes....
Well a helpful site has put up the explanations for all the new icons that are used to explain terrorism. My favourite has to be the one for "Don't run if you set yourself on fire" which looks like this:


2003-03-21--Dont_Run.jpg

Posted by Ozguru at 07:00 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Bad Publicity?

There's an old saying about there being no such thing as bad publicity. Well all the papers and newsites are full of stories about something we can't discuss. As per Basil's advice - "we won't mention the war".

All this alternate news is distracting from the publicity seeking Microslash so they have announced a brand new vulnerability that affects all versions of Windows. It is a real humdinger - highly critical involving malicious web sites and emails and everything. The only solution is to patch everything or $buy$ newer software which doesn't have THIS bug (lots of others included for future publicity and enjoyment).

What was that item a few days ago? Here's a nickel son, buy yourself a real computer.

Posted by Ozguru at 06:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 20, 2003

Politics vs Schools

Most people are aware that there is some discrepancy between the results of public (government funded) and independant (partially government funded) schools. Thanks to the NSW Teachers Federation the size of the gap is not known but as a parent I am firmly convinced that independant schools will be more effective for my children. You may or may not agree but what is interesting is the degree of support for independant schools (and freedom of choice for parents) provided by the various parties standing for election on Saturday.

Note that currently the state government does contribute to the cost of education of all children. This is primarily directed at public schools but a student in a non-government school is currently funded to 25% of the amount commited to a government school. In other words, if you send your child to a non-government school, the state government will spend less money on your child.

Six of the parties were asked four questions:
1. Will you continue to fund students at 25%?
2. Will you maintain interest rate subsidies for approved building loans?
3. Will you increase the grants for disabled students (up to the 25% level)?
4. Will you maintain the independant authority of the "Board of Studies"?

The answers (based on stated policies and formal advice from the relevant individual) appear below along with the name of the spokesperson and a quick score. An answer of Yes scores 1, No scores 0, any hesitation or reservation costs a half point. Increasing the funding gains a point.

Labor (J.A. Watkins): Yes, Yes, Not sure, Yes (3.5)
Liberal/National (B.R. O'Farrell): Yes, Yes, Not sure, Yes (3.5)
Greens (J Kaye): No, Yes but will review, No, No (0.5)
Aust. Democrats (A. Chesterfield-Evans): Yes, Yes, Yes, No (3.0)
Christian Democrats (G. Moyes): Yes (incr to 30%), Yes, Yes, Yes (5.0)
One Nation (D Oldfield): Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes (4.0)

Obviously there are other issues at stake but if you support independant schooling you should at least consider the Christian Democrats in the Senate. If you are against independant schooling feel free to vote for the Greens.

Posted by Ozguru at 06:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

101 Dumbest Moments in Business

For eveything under the sun there is somebody watching, collecting statistics and making lists. This one is the list of the 101 dumbest moments in Business for 2003.

The company we all loved to hate has 7 entries (more than any other single organization include MacDonalds). This includes entries #48, #49, #50, #51 which are all related to the promotion (demotion) of ".NOT". Entry #41 was related to the aborted campaign to spread graffiti all over New York to promote "MSN 8".

Entry #11:

Whiffed pitch No. 2: swiping your competitor's idea and completely screwing it up.
In an attempt to blunt Apple's (AAPL) "Switch" campaign, Microsoft posts a page on its website, titled "Confessions of a Mac to PC Convert," featuring a woman touting the Windows XP operating system. It's soon revealed, however, that the woman pictured is a model and the touting comes from a freelance writer paid by Gates & Co.

And the highest scoring entry for MicroSlosh is #5:

Celebrating the can-do spirit that continues to make American capitalism the envy of the world.
At a developers conference in September, Microsoft (MSFT) senior vice president Brian Valentine describes the state of the art in OS security: "Every operating system out there is about equal.... We all suck."

Speak for yourself Brian!

Also worthy of comment at #31 is the "Dude! You're getting a Cell!" episode.

Posted by Ozguru at 07:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 19, 2003

Beating the English

Oh well, there goes another sporting loss for the UK. From Column 8 in the SMH today:

Once again, Oz has thrashed the Poms at one of their national sports. Mike Dobbie, ex-Wahroonga, and his wife, Ruth Arkell, ex-Woy Woy, witnessed an Australian team win the 19th World Pooh-Sticks Championship, held at a lock on an Oxfordshire stretch of the Thames on Sunday. "Admittedly the A. A. Milne-invented activity is more of a game than a sport," says Mike, "nonetheless, it was great to see the Southern Cross flapping in the Mother Country's breeze."
The skill-filled contest involves dropping a stick from a bridge over a river and seeing how fast it travels. The Oxfordshire lock is not the original Pooh-Sticks bridge where Winnie the Pooh and Christopher Robin played - it all started in Ashdown Forest, east Sussex.

Posted by Ozguru at 08:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

404 Not Found

Moveable Type have a system where users who have paid (donated) money for the software get listed in a "recently updated" section on the main page. This is a great way to find other blogs and explore the net.

There was an interesting site that I stumbled across last night: Zapology - blogging for attention deficient which in turn had a link to a great 404 page error (please read the error carefully).

I remember reading about how to do real 404 pages (and other smart stuff) in apache but I could never complete anything as witty as this one.

Posted by Ozguru at 07:30 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

All together now...

Apparently someone has found yet another exploit when you use Windows for real work on the Internet. First use of the exploit was in the .mil domain.

All together now ....

1 ...

2 ...

3 ...

Here's a nickel son, get yourself a real computer! (from Dilbert)

Could be a Mac, could be Linux, could even be a Sun box - just stop running toy systems in the real world. Cool for games, and fiddling but uncool for the military.

Posted by Ozguru at 06:30 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Keynote and RSS

Just found a couple of references to a great idea. This is one of those things that is just so obvious but only after someone thinks of it ....

First there is an article at MacSlash , then a mention on inessential.com and finally what seems to have started the ball rolling is at Radio Weblogs .

Basically the two suggestions that jump out at me are the use of NNW and Keynote (which I can then drive from my mobile phone thanks to Clicker ) AND the idea of a Baysian filter to find more stuff like what I already read . That sounds like a great replacement for the daily paper (especially given that my local daily papers don't have RSS feeds).

Posted by Ozguru at 06:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 18, 2003

War Bits and Pieces

This image (from the SMH) sort of sums up the attitude of most people I have spoken to:

2003-02-18--No_War.jpg

In another article the SMH reports that He [GWB] promised the Iraqi people: "The day of your liberation is near." Is that the day Saddam is defeated or the day when the US pulls out?

I guess that we will also have to declare war on all the other nations with weapons of mass destruction (USA, UK, France, USSR, China etc) and those who have a history of killing their own people (including the unborn?).

Actually, I think I have made my feelings clear and like one of my favorite sites I am going to try to avoid saying anything further about the war. Basically it is a tragic mistake and there is nothing I can do or say that will change it.

Expect more exciting news about the one horse local elections instead :-)

Posted by Ozguru at 09:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Legal Support

The SMH has a very long article about containing snippits about the war. Normally I don't quote articles directly but in this case the relevant part is quite short:

Legal case for war dubious, warns Clark
The United States and Britain were unlikely to find legal support for an attack on Iraq, New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark said today. They would "stretch back through a string of UN resolutions to construct a legal edifice for what is happening", she said. "I think they will fail to convince most international lawyers. I think the lawyers will argue about this until kingdom come."

I can solve the problem. Any lawyers who don't support the legal case for the war can be sent to the front. Won't be any problem getting legal support in that case ....

[HINT FOR HUMOUR IMPAIRED: No I do not agree with the war - see the song below and earlier articles - I am pointing out the silliness of haggling about the legality/illegality of a war that should not happen.]

Posted by Ozguru at 06:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

MCSE? Why Bother?

Thinking of getting the worlds most useless qualification? No I don't mean a mail order degree from an unaccredited institution. I'm talking about becoming a Microslosh Certifiable Something Else (MCSE). Don't bother. Microslosh are about to put you out of work: Microslosh explores self-managing software.

OK. Here is the deal. Some time ago (1993), some dude got all excited about trying to manage hetrogeneous networks of systems. The result was Cfengine. Sort of worked, quite complex and can be just as unmanageable as the network if not used correctly (i.e. when you get grad students to set it up). This has more recently evolved to v2 with all sorts of bells and whistles (included better control of the grad students). As with all really great stuff which starts out seeming a bit strange, the software is free (as in beer?).

Then the commercial guys started to get excited about this distributed management plus load sharing and application distribution and all that. First cab off the rank that I spotted was N1 (Sun) closely followed by IBM and HP (note all UNIX solutions). Lots of hot air, not much tangible in terms of user stories and real-life test beds yet.

Now all of a sudden, the company that still can't solve the blue screen of death, cannot design secure software, cannot design tasteful interfaces and is the worlds largest convicted monopolist has decided that it will do this too. Now instead of having useless software running on nodes supported by hundreds of MCSEs, we will now have useless software running on nodes controlled by other nodes also running useless software which will be managed by thousands of MSCEs. Oh.

Sorry, false alarm. Lots of MSCEs now required to manage self managing automatically failing software.....

BTW I have worked at a site with ~100 nodes managed using cfengine.

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 17, 2003

Stunned

Pass the smelling salts.... What a shock election discovery.... The SMH noticed today that Labor to benefit most from the Greens' preference deals.

Who could have expected that? Not that it has been any different in any election in Australia since the Green party was formed.

There are three problems with the Greens: First they are fundamentally a one issue party which can't cope with more generic issues of government (e.g. legalizing drugs?), second they ignore perfectly valid evidence that doesn't fit their preconceptions (e.g. the bush vs burnoff issue), and thirdly they are just a just a mechanism for funneling votes back to labor.

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

March 16, 2003

51st What?

Found this lovely item in the SMH yesterday. Apparently the Labor party is somewhat confused about the relationship between Australia, the US, and the Australian States. Quoting from the article: Opposition Leader Simon Crean said Mr Howard's evocation of Pearl Harbour suggested Australia was an outpost of the United States. "Goodness gracious, what have we become? The 51st state of the United States?" he said on ABC radio in Melbourne.

There are two problems with this. First there are officially 50 states plus the District of Columbia. I suspect that (like the Australian Territories), that DC would become the 51st State, not Australia. There are also a number of US protectorates around as well. The second error is that for Australia to become part of the US, the Australian States would make the decision and it is likely that this would disolve the Federation and we wouldn't have to listen to any more of this drivel.

I guess that would make us like the 52nd, 53rd, .... 59th States (ignoring the ACT because its just pretending to be a state).

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

March 15, 2003

UK vs France

Talk about stating the obvious. The BBC had this article , I mean what did you really expect the UK to do? Applaude them? Kiss them on both cheeks?

UK condemns French veto stance
War with Iraq appears a step closer after Tony Blair said he believed a second United Nations resolution on Iraq was "now probably less likely than at any time". His official spokesman said that efforts were continuing to secure a diplomatic solution to the crisis - but accused France of "poisoning" the diplomatic process.
Government sources said efforts could continue into next Monday if necessary, but Downing Street said they could not "elasticate for ever".
Amid rising tension, the Queen has cancelled a visit to Belgium next week on the advice of the Foreign Office because it was felt that it would not be appropriate for her to be out of the country "given the present circumstances".
Earlier Foreign Secretary Jack Straw condemned France's "extraordinary" intention to veto any further UN motion on Iraq and implied their action had made it more difficult to avoid war.
Chancellor Gordon Brown said he would back military action against Iraq without a second resolution if France used an "unreasonable" veto, arguing that Mr Blair should be given "100% support".
The leader of the British opposition, Iain Duncan Smith, met Mr Blair on Thursday morning and said he had been told a second resolution was "less likely than at any time before".
Mr Duncan Smith reported the prime minister as blaming the "intransigence" of France in rejecting Britain's efforts to find a compromise second UN resolution.

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

March 14, 2003

Singalong...

While I was off sick, a friend sent me this lovely (catchy) song. It goes to the tune of "If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands":

If You're Happy And You Know It, Bomb Iraq
If you cannot find Osama, Bomb Iraq
If the terrorists are frisky,
Pakistan is looking shifty,
and North Korea is too risky,
Bomb Iraq.

If we have no allies with us, bomb Iraq.
If we think that someone's dissed us, bomb Iraq.
So to hell with the inspections,
Let's look tough for the elections,
Close your mind and take directions,
Bomb Iraq.

It's pre-emptive non-aggression, bomb Iraq.
To prevent this mass destruction, bomb Iraq.
They've got weapons that we can't see,
And that's all the proof that we need,
If they're not there,then they MUST be there,
Bomb Iraq.

If you never were elected, bomb Iraq.
If your mood is quite dejected, bomb Iraq.
If you think Saddam's gone mad,
With the weapons that he had,
And he tried to kill your dad,
Bomb Iraq.

If corporate fraud is growin', bomb Iraq.
If your ties to it are showin', bomb Iraq.
If your politics are sleazy,
And hiding cash connections ain't easy,
And your accountants getting queasy,
Bomb Iraq.

Fall in line and follow orders, bomb Iraq.
For our might knows not our borders, bomb Iraq.
Disagree?.... We'll call it treason,
Let's make war, not love this season,
Even if we have no reason,
Bomb Iraq.

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 07, 2003

Bombs Away

Looks as if Bushie has forgotten a basic rule about not trying to fight on too many fronts at once. Currently he is fighting the "war on drugs", "war on terrorism" and he is itching to fight "Gulf War II - rewriting history". Now he is preparing another "front" against "North Korea".

In the meantime, another blog has a fascinating list of places that the US has bombed since WWII. As the site points out, none of these attacks has really made a great improvement in the countries concerned.

Checking the list makes me wonder why the Muslims are so angry with the US - surely most of the targets are Catholic?!

P.S. This is an early entry for Friday as I will not be in a fit state to post anything tomorrow due to planned day surgery.

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

March 02, 2003

Lorem Ipsum

What is Lorem Ipsum?
Neque porro
quisquam est
qui dolorem
ipsum quia
dolor sit,
consectetur,
adipisci velit...

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras tincidunt diam ac diam. Cras tristique, augue vitae dictum tristique, turpis elit mollis nunc, nec venenatis turpis risus ac mi. Ut eget ipsum. Nunc a diam. Nunc ut ante eget eros blandit convallis. Proin vitae pede. Nam semper gravida arcu. Vivamus porta sollicitudin neque. Nam luctus. Mauris tempor dolor vel libero. Nullam arcu turpis, pulvinar eu, luctus in, rutrum sed, lectus. Pellentesque arcu lectus, congue id, rutrum eu, fringilla id, elit. Vivamus nibh sapien, eleifend eget, mattis non, placerat vel, magna. Pellentesque hendrerit ullamcorper felis. Aliquam feugiat, quam nec commodo pulvinar, est lacus faucibus nunc, scelerisque ultricies tortor libero sed tortor. Suspendisse nec mauris eu nisl sodales ultrices. Fusce quam metus, placerat sed, imperdiet elementum, luctus nec, augue.

[Ed: The content of this post was taken from Madfish Willie's instructions...]

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

March 01, 2003

Retrospective - 2003/02

I have often wandered through the archives of a blog somewhere by clicking on next/prev post but it has often been a frustrating experience because there is usually little in the way of a map to guide the unfortunate traveller. For that reason, I decided to try and put a brief summary of what I consider to be the more interesting posts each month.

In this case, the month is February 2003. I had only just started blogging. In hindsight, I made a number of very silly mistakes - like using my real name and including personal pictures and information. Some months later I was stalked by a half-wit who threatened my kids. As a result, most of the personal stuff got stripped out which makes the early blog seems somewhat bare...

Mark of Cain
A pro-US post (or at least an anti-Chinese post). I personally liked the title but I did get tired of explaining it to people who had no idea what it was about.

Microslosh Strikes Again
The very first "Microslosh" (sometimes called "Microslash") post. Like many others it derides a very successful company - talk about "tall poppy" syndrome :-)

Britain Too Dangerous?
Another first - the first mention of WWDC. Of course I didn't actually get there until 2004 so it was somewhat premature.

Go Kiwis
A positive story about our nearest neighbours? I must have been drinking.

Golf War II
War vs Australia
Two anti-Iraq-war posts. It is interesting to see how much my views changed between then and now...

Huh?
The first but not the last time that Australian politics did not make sense...

AI vs Minsky
Mental Games
A little name dropping can go a long way. I had written a number of anti-Dennett papers at university and this was a chance to say something slighting... I followed it up a week later with a dig at Minsky which got me a real genuine comment...

Marker Post
This entry is a marker to commemorate the very first blog post on 'Bored on the Bus'. It was lost in the great reshuffle of a week later when a hardware failure (nut loose on keyboard) caused a complete reinstall of the blog.

Posted by Ozguru at 12:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack