« Not Cuddly: Echinda | Main | BOFH »
August 28, 2003
Designer Bugs III
Hopefully this will be the last word on the matter :-)
There have been some *heated* comments and a few other blogs are getting on on the act. Patrick has this item and also this post about the lack of design sensibility. That is the key to the original comments. It was not a comparison of usability or platform preference - the point was the Microslosh did the wrong thing (and have been doing it for years, despite the hype and promise of "safe" computing).
I can remember a time (in the late 80's) when Sun was being hammered for shoddy security practice. They used to distribute an operating system with rsh access turned on and a '+' in /etc/.rhosts - guaranteed security hole. Due to pressure, they fixed the problem. Some time later there was an outcry about the sendmail version that shipped with Solaris 2.2 and again, Sun amended their evil ways and become a more model citizen of the internet. All vendors, even Microslosh, are entitled to an occasional error, the question is what they do when the error is discovered:
The issue at hand is that the recent virus attacks would not have happened (or would have been less severe) if Microslosh had done the right thing. They have not done so, despite plenty of previous exposure to the problems and it is not outside the bounds of possibility that in a litigious environment, some trigger happy lawyer could make a reasonable case for damages.
Now onto the comments from previous articles. First, some background - Pete happens to be my youngest brother and he is a PC/WinTel bigot (just as I am a Unix bigot). He has had little exposure to Macs and they way they function (hence he is unaware of what they can do). Also it is worth noting that we live in Australia and his comments about software for the Mac in Australia are completely valid.
Pete started the ball rolling by complaining about the lack of Mac software (the biggest retailer of Macs in Sydney never has more than about 20 titles on display) and this is valid (but irrelevant to the points being discussed).
Jivha added some comments about user attitudes to poor design and I think he is right which led to this post.
Raena from Tasmania jumped in on the comment about the lack of Mac software. I think I had better go visit Tassie based on that comment alone :-) She is right, there are many packages for the Mac and given that there are limits to how many variations of a word processor can actually be useful, the Mac has it covered. You need practical software, it exists (including Microslosh Office or the alternate clones like ThinkFree Office and OpenOffice). The weak spot (and this bugs Pete) is games. Not all games appear on PC and Mac but this is in fact true of any two gaming platforms you pick. Personally, there are enough of the games I want to play and that will do me. More importantly, the current Macs have Unix under the hood (i.e. like Linux with a nice face) and that means a lot more than 'New Technology'. BTW, Raena also has a related post on her blog.
Pete jumped back in and asked a series of questions about the Mac which Raena has answered in some detail. I would like to tackle them as well because I think it is important to clear away misconceptions about these things. I have an advantage over Pete in that I use both platforms and work with guys who have spent the last two weeks trying to roll out zillions of updates to some 3500 Wintel boxes in between recurrent attacks of viruses.
I guess Pete doesn't have to buy a Mac yet because the one thing missing is his driving game - but on the other hand, he will have to buy an xbox to play that anyway so maybe the best combination would be a Mac and an xbox to replace the PC :-)
More seriously, the suggestion made in the second article was that offenders (computers infected with a virus), regardless of platform, be automatically disconnected from their ISP and then required to "show cause" before being allowed to reconnect. Effectively a form of licencing, easy to implement, easy to manage and platform agnostic.
Mind you, we all know that in this case, 99.9% of the offenders will be PC users!
Posted by Ozguru at August 28, 2003 10:08 PM
Comments
Posted by: Jivha at August 28, 2003 10:08 PM
Posted by: ozguru at August 28, 2003 10:08 PM
Posted by: Peskie at August 28, 2003 10:08 PM
Posted by: ozguru at August 28, 2003 10:08 PM